I often get people asking me “does Duolingo work?” or “is Duolingo good?” These days, it seems to be the default app on any language learner’s phone. But to be completely honest, I don’t like Duolingo. It’s not something I use in my language learning pursuits at all, and it never will be. I decided to write this post to explain why.

Duolingo is an app and desktop game which has exploded in recent years. It’s easy to see why it’s so popular. It is a fun, addictive game which rewards you for practising your language and for being consistent. Its interface has an attractive and intuitive design that is pleasant to interact with. Best of all, it’s free.

Why Duolingo doesn’t work

As someone who dedicates a good part of my life to language learning and sharing that passion with others, an app that encourages more people to learn languages and makes it easy to do so should be great news. And while I do appreciate the accessibility that Duolingo has brought to the language learning community, I think it is highly, highly overrated. As someone who is qualified in linguistics and experienced in language teaching and learning, I can say that Duolingo simply doesn’t work.

This is not to say that Duolingo should not be used at all. It is a good tool for language practice. Used in conjunction with a language course or a teacher, it’s all good. The problem is when people try to use Duolingo to learn a language to fluency.

Duolingo has always annoyed me, but I have been holding off writing anything negative about it for years because I like to keep my blog a positive place. But I decided to write this post for people who might be considering or using Duolingo to learn a language, who may not understand the science of language learning.

 Does Duolingo work? My vote is for “no”. And here’s why.

Does duolingo work?

It doesn’t teach grammar

The first and only time I used Duolingo, I gave up pretty quickly because it didn’t give me any explanation of the grammar used to form the sentences it was teaching. For me, that is a really important part of learning and understanding a language properly.

Honestly, the amount of times I’ve seen someone posting a screenshot of Duolingo in a Facebook group or subReddit asking the most basic of grammar questions makes me sad. There is a reason why things like the difference between el and la in Spanish or why verbs change their endings are usually the first thing taught in a normal language-learning course. It’s because you need them to form sentences of your own. You need them to understand other people.

That’s not to say that Duolingo doesn’t teach any grammar. I know they do provide lesson summaries now, as well as forum explanations. But this is still not good enough in my opinion. This is because the explanations are pretty incomplete, and they’ll never be the main focus of the lesson for most students. And while forums are good, they’re not completely reliable because the people frequenting them are mostly other learners, not experts.

It gives you no context

Sure, you can tell Duo your goals for learning the language, but still, most of the sentences or words given are completely random and don’t represent anything you’d normally say in real life. Duolingo gets you to memorise sentences that (often) have no application in the real world. The sentences and words are also given at random, instead of making up a whole coherent text or story. There is a reason why it is a lot easier to remember things you’ve learned in a conversation or while reading. Most successful language learners learn in context.

If it’s not teaching grammar, and it’s not teaching common phrases, then you have to wonder – what is it actually teaching?

It doesn’t prepare you for real-life conversations

This is the logical result of the previous two points.

The goal of learning a language is usually communication, right? To communicate, you have to not only understand what others say, but produce sentences yourself, too.

The fact that there are no real grammar lessons will make it a lot harder for you to generate sensical sentences on your own. You may try to construct something with the words you know and the sentences you’ve practised, but if you don’t understand the grammar, chances are your speech will be grammatically incorrect. This will make it harder (sometimes impossible) for people to understand what you are saying.

When the sentences that you are practising on Duolingo have no context and no real meaning, you will have to work harder to think of something meaningful to say in real-life conversations. This is because you will have spent time memorising random sentences instead of useful common expressions and phrases.

It only allows one right answer

In the translation exercises (which are the bulk of what Duolingo is about), the software is programmed to only accept one right answer. This is problematic as most languages have many ways of saying the same thing. Students who input an answer that is right but not recognised on Duolingo may think they are wrong. On the flip side, I have seen instances where learners assume they are correct but Duolingo doesn’t accept it, when in fact they are wrong. As you can see, this can cause a lot of confusion for people who are self-studying. Language is a lot more than just right or wrong. You can’t replace real people who give you feedback on your writing.

Duolingo won’t make you fluent

You may have been able to reach the top of the Duolingo tree, but have you mastered the language? I doubt that anybody has become fluent using Duolingo alone. So you’ve spend all this time completing the whole programme up to their most “advanced” level, and still you’re not even close to being able to genuinely connect with a native speaker. What’s the point? Wouldn’t you rather spend your time doing something more productive for your language learning? Wouldn’t you rather use a programme that guarantees results?

It focuses on translation

The main tool used on Duolingo is translation. This means they teach you the language by getting you to translate things from one language into another. While translation is a useful language-learning method, using it alone can lead to the inability to produce your own sentences. And a crucial part of the language-learning process is producing your own sentences. This is how your brain makes the connections on how the language is used. This is how your brain moves away from translating everything in your head, and towards thinking in the language and speaking fluently.

There are ethical questions

Duolingo is a business valued at $700 million which relies on volunteers to make its business work. The company has more than 300 volunteers who work to create content and moderate the forums. In fact, the majority of language content on Duolingo was obtained by them for free. They do pay their engineers and designers, however. (source)

This just doesn’t sit right with me. I think a business this successful, that does make money off its ads and its premium service, should value the work of its contributors. An app for language learning that particularly undervalues its language professionals, is a real tragedy for the language community. So in that sense, I think using Duolingo is a bit unethical, as you are benefiting from someone’s unpaid labour, while giving the app money (through ad revenue or by going premium).

 Apps like Duolingo

There are many tools out there for learning languages that are just as fun as Duolingo and much more useful, and I wish those would get more attention.

Free apps like Duolingo include Memrise, Mondly and Clozemaster. These apps all have premium versions as well. You also have Babbel and MosaLingua, which charge small monthly fees.

If you’re looking for something more in-depth, check out my round-up of the best online language courses.

So have a look around, do some research, and try something different! You might find something that works much better than Duolingo.

To summarise, ethical issues aside, Duolingo is fine if you recognise it for what it is – an engaging way to practise the language you are learning. But does Duolingo work to make you fluent or properly teach you a language? The answer is definitely not.

What are your thoughts on Duolingo? Share with us in the comments!

Pin this post to save it for later!

What I think of Duolingo

Disclosure: Please note that some of the links above are affiliate links. This means that at no additional cost to you, I will earn a commission if you decide to make a purchase after clicking through the link.  I recommend these companies because they are helpful and useful, not because of the small commissions I make if you decide to buy something through my links.



  1. I totally agree! I used Duolingo to brush up on my German, but my main frustration was your first point – it didn’t help me to understand how to structure my sentences and know whether they are grammatically correct. It is good for vocabulary, but now I can read a fair amount of German but still can’t string many sentences together. I may have to check out some of your alternative suggestions!

    • Suzie Reply

      Yes, that is the biggest pitfall of Duolingo really! Hope you can figure out that pesky German grammar soon 😊

  2. HI! Thank you for your nice article.

    I was not a fan of Duolingo too for the same reasons as you mentioned.

    I used for 1-year Memrise to improve my Danish vocabulary. I Learnt many words but no grammar. ( I do not recommend Memrise)

    I found out that Duolingo introduced a grammar section called tips. It works nicely for danish.
    Not sure about German :-). Danish grammar is way easier.

    PS. I use Duolingo from PC, I cannot find many feature from the app

  3. Although the author brings up valid points, I do not agree with this article in it’s entirety.. Yes Duolingo has it’s flaws just as most online learning tools do. As a retired educator/administrator I decided to attempt to learn Spanish now that I have more free time on my hands. I purchased “Rocket Language” of which the author recommends. It offered some assistance but I eventually became bored and disinterested. Then I fell upon Duolingo and my interest was immediately restored. My knowledge and ability to read, write and understand the Spanish language continues to increase immensely. ( Speaking and understand verbal communication I find much more difficult but can be expected) The tips section associated with each individual lesson can help a great deal to understand beyond the basics. If you still have problems with sentence structure and the like, seek out other sources to compliment your learning. The internet is full of useful resources. In conclusion, I find Duolingo to be a very useful learning tool, one that I look forward to each day and would definitely recommend. It has me looking forward to my lesson along side my morning cup of coffee. Remember, it is FREE and you will take out of it what you put into it. If you objective is to become fluent in a language, seek out course at you local community college or the like. I personally do not see you achieving that level of success from an online course. You need an experienced instructor as well as an outlet where you are constantly speaking the language with other people/students.

  4. Lots of these points are simply untrue. The author must be trying to steer folks towards affiliate links for the other apps to make some money. Duolingo absolutely teaches grammar (just open the tips for each skill), and it accepts several correct answers on most questions (just review the user comments on a few and you’ll see).

    • Suzie Reply

      Thanks for posting your thoughts on this Ginni. I am glad to hear that Duolingo is improving its grammar tips and widening its range of accepted answers since the last time I’ve seen or used it. However, most of the enquiries on language help forums are still the most basic things that Duolingo failed to teach them. I genuinely believe there are much better apps and resources out there and many of them are free. So no, this post is not made to promote other apps but simply share my personal thoughts based on my experience as a language learner and tutor. I also hope to show people that there are other options out there which could be a better fit. The main purpose of my blog is to provide helpful language learning tips and the affiliate links are a way to maintain the website but they are not the main purpose of it. Hope this has cleared things up!

  5. I strongly disagree. Nobody is saying that duolingo will teach you fluency. It is great to teach you basics and keep you motivated thanks to its gamified nature. It is a great start and when used with other resources I was able to learn Spanish quite well.

    • Suzie Reply

      That’s great that it helped you. Unfortunately many people do think it’s all you need to become fluent, and Duolingo itself acts like you are failing if you’re not using it. I think it would help if people knew it’s not that easy to learn a language!

  6. Maybe the real issue here is those certain people not fully grasping what learning a language actually entails. They should be informed that it takes more than dicking around on an app for a couple minutes a day.

    Used in conjunction with reading, writing, and listening to the target language along with a good grammar work book, i believe it is a valuable asset. Memrise these days is practically unusable. A few years ago it was great, but now they charge money. I purchased it once, but it didn’t change much. Memrise has a LOT to work on .
    I’ve tried many language-learning apps, and I think Duolingo is by far the funnest. Once you know what you’re looking for grammatically it’s easier to pick up and understand what you’re learning.
    They also have a story function with fill-in-the-blanks, which allows you to listen and interact with the language in a fun way. I don’t know when the last time was that you looked at this app, but a lot has changed. It might be helpful for this blog post for you to take a look at all of the improvements. Just my two cents there.

  7. Duolingo is a piece of crap. I wasted a year on it trying to learn Japanese but recently started watching broadcast Japanese television, (everything, from talk shows to, drama, to on location travel shows, to food, games to even the commercials) and I noticed, nearly everything Duolingo focuses on, is not only random and pretty irrelevant, but no one seems to talk that way in real life, and huge portion of their translations are guiding you into misunderstanding it’s uses. A month of Japanese TV and I have learned more then I have in a year of Duolingos crap…. and I understand it in the proper context, not that annoying mental translation they teach instead of learning it as it is mentally as well, which only leads into someone thinking in English and then translating it, instead of thinking it in Japanese. Which is how to learn ANY language… not mental translations.
    Also the animations they polluted the place with recently make some people physically ill (serious; some people had seizures). And Duolingo doesn’t care enough to allow anyone to turn them off.

Write A Comment

%d bloggers like this: